The burgeoning debate surrounding presidential immunity represents a complex intersection of fundamental law, historical precedent, and potentially far-reaching implications for the balance of influence within the United States. While total immunity from prosecution is demonstrably unlikely, the extent to which a current president enjoys protection

The concept of presidential immunity persists as a contentious and often-debated topic in the realm of law. Proponents argue that this immunity is essential to ensure the unfettered fulfillment of presidential duties. Opponents, however, contend that such immunity grants presidents a free pass from legal ramifications, potentially eroding the rule